United States v. Paul Beckmann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that consent to search a computer was reasonably understood to encompass its external, connected hard drive
• finding no abuse of discretion in $3,000 restitution to Vicky where the defendant possessed 14 videos and two images of her
• finding $3,000 per victim “an amount consistent with the awards in similar possession cases since Paroline”
• collecting cases and noting that an award of $3,000 per victim appeared to be “an amount consistent with awards in similar possession cases since Paroline”
• in determining scope of consent, “[r]easonableness is measured in objective terms based on the totality of the circumstances”
• in determining scope of consent, \[r]easonableness is measured in objective terms based on the totality of the circumstances\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).