Fifth Circuit· 9/30/2016
United States v. Patrick Mire
Citations
- 838 F.3d 621
- 2016 WL 5746308
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the government must be allowed to intervene in an action concerning property that is subject to an order of restitution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wiener, Clement, Costa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court· 1985-06-26· cited 792×
- Mustang Pipeline Co. v. Driver Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court· 2004-04-23· cited 493×
- United States v. CraftSupreme Court· 2002-04-17· cited 448×
- B. T. Woodard and B. J. Woodard, D/B/A Woodard Motor Company v. General Motors CorporationFifth Circuit· 1962-01-11· cited 70×
- In Re: HornsbyFifth Circuit· 2002-08-27· cited 47×
- Af-Cap, Inc. v. Republic of CongoFifth Circuit· 2006-08-23· cited 43×
- United States v. ClaytonFifth Circuit· 2010-08-03· cited 39×
- Briargrove Shopping Center Joint Venture v. Vilar, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1982-11-30· cited 39×
- Lennar Corp. v. Markel American Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court· 2013-08-23· cited 38×
- United States v. LoftisFifth Circuit· 2010-05-17· cited 26×
- United States v. Ghassan ElashiFifth Circuit· 2015-06-12· cited 20×
- De Leon v. AldreteCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1965-12-15· cited 16×
- Home Reader Service, Inc. v. GrappiCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1969-09-29· cited 8×
- Grant v. Sherwood Shores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1972-03-01· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.