United States v. Patrick McDonald United States of America v. Michael Pollard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A reasonable jury could not conclude beyond a reasonable doubt, from McDonald’s role as supplier alone, that McDonald was knowledgeable of all operations at the [drug] house and therefore used Pinkney within the meaning of [section 861(a)].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).