United States v. Patrick M. Donovan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the district court properly determined that there were no factual issues and that it should decide the issue of contractual interpretation as a matter of law
• “The question of whether the language of an agreement is ambiguous is a question of law. Once the language of the contract has been held to be ambiguous, the interpretation of such language is a question of fact that turns on the intent of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).