United States v. Patrick Galvan (04-1741) Charles Johnson (05-1188)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the district court at sentencing need not collaterally review [a defendant’s] prior sentences”
• noting that the court found it “telling” that an electronic monitoring condition of probation had to be “reinstated” after a prison term, in concluding that probation was constructively revoked despite the lack of specific terminology to that effect
• upholding role enhancement where the defendant “exercised a degree of control or authority over others within the conspiracy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).