United States v. Patrick Asubonteng, Also Known as Patrick Rivers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This court has consistently held that such conclusory allegations [about potentially exonerating evidence in the form of unknown witness testimony] do not satisfy Strickland’s prejudice component.”
• “conclusory allegations do not satisfy Strickland’s prejudice component”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).