Skip to main content
· 7/11/2006

United States v. Patricio Sandoval-Rodriguez

Citations

  • 452 F.3d 984
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17256
  • 2006 WL 1889292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no discovery violation and then assuming a violation to discuss the three factors
  • finding no discovery violation and then assuming a violation to discuss the three factors
  • “[Defendant’s] minimal prior criminal history was taken into account in arriving at the appropriate advisory Guidelines range.”
  • “[t]he government’s disclosure pattern in a given case does not offend Brady . . . so long as the evidence in question is disclosed prior to the end of trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Hansen, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.