United States v. Paschal Demauro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, \as a general rule a corporation is liable for the criminal acts of its employees if done on its behalf and within the scope of the employees' authority\
• more stringent view of materiality applied in SEC proceedings may not apply “in the context of a grand jury investigation”
• “[A]s a general rule a corporation is liable for the criminal acts of its employees if done on its behalf and within the scope of the employees’ authority.”
• “[A]s a general rule a corporation is liable for the criminal acts of its employees if done on its behalf and within the scope of the employees’ authority.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).