United States v. Parnell Harold Boucha

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[t]he language of the statute is the starting point for interpretation, and it should also be the ending point if the plain meaning of that language is clear”
• “[The statutory language] should also be the ending point if the plain meaning of that language is clear.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).