United States v. Parkhill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the trial court ruled on the plaintiffs motion in limine at the beginning of the trial
• declining to address an argument where the appellant “completely fail[ed] to cite any legal authority to support her contention that the Superior Court erred”
• The purpose of Rule 26 is “to prevent unfair surprises during trial by putting the opposing party on notice of what evidence will be introduced.”
• “Varlack never produced these records in discovery and did not identify them as an exhibit in the Joint Final Pre–Trial Order…”
• The purpose of Rule 26 is ‘“to prevent unfair surprises during trial by putting the opposing party on notice of what evidence will be introduced.”
• a contemporaneous objection to the admission of evidence was not required to preserve an issue on appeal where the appellant presented the issue to the Superior Court through a pre-trial motion in limine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).