United States v. Panepinto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendants’ failure to make required contributions constituted exercise of control over the disposition of employee welfare benefit plan assets under ERISA
• holding that defendants’ failure to make required contributions constituted exercise of control over the disposition of employee welfare benefit plan assets under ERISA
• holding same where agreement provided that employer had no legal right to “any sum paid by or due from the Employer ” (emphasis added)
• employer contributions considered “assets” of the funds where agreement explicitly provided that the employer had no “legal or equitable right, title or interest in or to any sun paid by or due from the Employer ... and of said benefit funds”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).