United States v. Pando Franco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that by answering some questions after having received Miranda warnings, defendant “waived his right to have the entire conversation, including the implicit references to his silence contained therein, used against him as substantive evidence of guilt”
• “[C]ircumstantial evidence is often used to establish the knowledge element for possession or importation of drugs.”
• “[T]he sole inquiry is not whether the jury’s verdict was ultimately correct but whether the jury made a reasonable decision based upon the evidence introduced at trial”.
• describing circuit split on this issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).