United States v. Palos-Marquez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the \in person nature of a tip gives it substantial indicia of reliability\
• suggesting that what is important is not just whether an informant reveals his/her basis of knowledge, but also whether or not that basis of knowledge is firsthand
• suggesting that what is important is not just whether an informant reveals his/her basis of knowledge, but also whether or not that basis of knowledge is firsthand
• explaining that an isolated fact's inability to establish reasonable suspicion is not dispositive, as courts consider the cumulative effect of all relevant facts
• rejecting defendant’s “at- tempt to discredit individually each of the facts used by agents to determine if there was reasonable suspicion to initiate the UNITED STATES v. VALDES-VEGA 8461 stop”
• “An investigatory stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment if the officer has a reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts that criminal activity may be afoot.” (citations and quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).