Skip to main content
· 6/29/1988

United States v. Palestine Liberation Organization

Citations

  • 695 F. Supp. 1456
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18608
  • 1988 WL 112585

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Congress has the power to enact statutes abrogating prior treaties or international obligations entered into by the United States”
  • “The PLO Mission to the United Nations is an invitee of the United Nations under the Headquarters Agreement and its status is protected by that agreement.”
  • “We refer to the Headquarters Agreement as a treaty, since we are not concerned here with making a distinction among different forms of international agreement. The applicable law implicates all forms, including the Headquarters Agreement.”
  • finding the 11 ATA inapplicable to the PLO Observer Mission
  • finding the ATA inapplicable to the PLO Observer Mission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Palmieri

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.