· 6/29/1988
United States v. Palestine Liberation Organization
Citations
- 695 F. Supp. 1456
- 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18608
- 1988 WL 112585
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Congress has the power to enact statutes abrogating prior treaties or international obligations entered into by the United States”
- “The PLO Mission to the United Nations is an invitee of the United Nations under the Headquarters Agreement and its status is protected by that agreement.”
- “We refer to the Headquarters Agreement as a treaty, since we are not concerned here with making a distinction among different forms of international agreement. The applicable law implicates all forms, including the Headquarters Agreement.”
- finding the 11 ATA inapplicable to the PLO Observer Mission
- finding the ATA inapplicable to the PLO Observer Mission
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Palmieri
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.