United States v. Palencia-Contreras

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that probable cause must dissipate after the commencement of prosecution
• deeming claims abandoned when plaintiff “failed to respond or even mention these claims in his opposition brief to defendants’ summary judgment motion”
• dismissing the plaintiff’s claims as abandoned because he “failed to respond or even mention these claims in his opposition brief to defendants’ summary judgment motion”
• deeming claims abandoned when plaintiff “failed to respond or even mention these claims in his opposition brief to defendants’ summary judgment motion”
• granting summary judgment for defendant officer on plaintiff’s malicious-prosecution claim because probable cause to arrest existed and plaintiff “[did] not allege that anything occurred between the arrest and prosecution that would negate probable cause”
• officers had probable cause based on victim identification even though alleged assailant had an alibi

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).