Skip to main content
· 7/31/2009

United States v. Padilla-Colón

Citations

  • 578 F.3d 23
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19097
  • 2009 WL 2581725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Inconsistencies between statements made during the [post-plea] proffer and statements made to the authorities on other occasions are not necessarily disqualifying. But the court may legitimately consider such inconsistencies in deciding on the truthfulness of the proffer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Lipez, Diclerico

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.