United States v. Pablo Ochoa, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Government had undertaken adequate means where it spent “several days” trying to locate the witness, it spoke to the witness’s employer, landlord, and other individuals, and obtained a material witness arrest warrant
• noting that in Cabrales the indictment did not “allege that the funds had been transported from one state to another.”
• stating the traditional rule that a conspiracy charge may be tried in any district in which an overt act of conspiracy occurred
• statements to an FBI agent violated Confrontation Clause where agent gave declarant an incentive to curry favor by implicating his co-conspirators and where declarant’s story spread blame to other participants
• statements to an FBI agent violated Confrontation Clause where agent gave declarant an incentive to curry favor by implicating his co- conspirators and where declarant’s story spread blame to other participants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).