United States v. Pablo Fernandez-Antonia, AKA \Pablo Fernandez\

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that prejudice requires showing that “absent the procedural errors,” alien “would not have been removed”
• to demonstrate prejudice, a non-citizen “must show that his proceeding contained errors so fundamental that he might have been deported in error”
• “A sentencing court employs a ‘categorical approach’ in determining whether a conviction under state law fits within the federal sentencing guidelines and thus merits an offense level enhancement.”
• “[Defendant] must show both a fundamental procedural error and prejudice resulting from that error.” (emphasis added)
• “[Defendant] must show both a fundamental procedural error and prejudice resulting from that error.” (emphasis added)
• \[Defendant] must show both a fundamental procedural error and prejudice resulting from that error. \ (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).