United States v. Paar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he issue is whether the evidence should be excluded because the flaw is large enough that the expert lacks good grounds for his or her conclusions.”
• “Materiality is for the court, state of mind is for the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).