United States v. Ozsusamlar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The remoteness in time of a prior act, while not dispositive in a Rule 404(b) analysis, should be considered by a district court in making its admissibility determination.” (citing United States v. Figueroa, 618 F.2d 934, 942 (2d Cir. 1980) (holding that in a Rule 404(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).