Skip to main content
· 8/22/2000

United States v. Owen Daniel Moore, III

Citations

  • 225 F.3d 637
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 21107
  • 2000 WL 1179790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding the Government’s discretion when the plea agreement stated: “The Defendant acknowledges that ... [the] United States retains complete discretion in determining whether a departure motion will be filed.”
  • “[W]hen a plea agreement allocates complete discretion to the government to consider whether a substantial assistance motion should be filed, we may only review the government’s decision for unconstitutional motives.”
  • “It is not necessary that a crime suggests planning in its most deliberative form; rather, it is sufficient if the evidence suggests merely that the crime was not committed in its simplest form.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Jones, Clay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.