Skip to main content
· 12/12/2007

United States v. Othuru

Citations

  • 65 M.J. 375
  • 2007 CAAF LEXIS 1657
  • 2007 WL 4355251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the “Government bears the burden of establishing that [the] constitutional error has no causal effect upon the findings”
  • finding “no good cause” for lengthy appellate delay, but holding that there was no basis for a finding of prejudice
  • finding “no good cause” for lengthy appellate delay, but holding that there was no basis for a finding of prejudice
  • finding “no good cause” for lengthy appellate delay, but holding that there was no basis for a finding of prejudice
  • “To say that an error did not contribute to the, verdict is, rather, to find that error unimportant in relation to everything else the jury considered on the issue in question, as revealed in the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Erdmann, Effron, Baker, Stucky, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.