· 12/12/2007
United States v. Othuru
Citations
- 65 M.J. 375
- 2007 CAAF LEXIS 1657
- 2007 WL 4355251
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that the “Government bears the burden of establishing that [the] constitutional error has no causal effect upon the findings”
- finding “no good cause” for lengthy appellate delay, but holding that there was no basis for a finding of prejudice
- finding “no good cause” for lengthy appellate delay, but holding that there was no basis for a finding of prejudice
- finding “no good cause” for lengthy appellate delay, but holding that there was no basis for a finding of prejudice
- “To say that an error did not contribute to the, verdict is, rather, to find that error unimportant in relation to everything else the jury considered on the issue in question, as revealed in the record.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Erdmann, Effron, Baker, Stucky, Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.