Skip to main content
· 12/1/1992

United States v. Osneth Olibrices

Citations

  • 979 F.2d 1557
  • 298 U.S. App. D.C. 347
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 31353
  • 1992 WL 347084

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a reduction for minor role in an offense cannot be awarded when the larger offense was not taken into account in setting the base level
  • holding that a reduction for minor role in an offense cannot be awarded when the larger offense was not taken into account in setting the base level
  • “[A] defendant is not entitled to have her sentence reduced for a minimal role in relevant conduct that had no part in the calculation of the base level.”
  • “[A] defendant is not entitled to have her sentence reduced for a minimal role in relevant conduct that had no part in the calculation of the base level.”
  • where larger conspiracy was not taken into account to set the base offense level, allowing it to be taken into account for purposes of a reduction for the mitigating role of the defendant would produce an “absurd result”
  • where larger conspiracy was not taken into account to set the base offense level, -6- allowing it to be taken into account for purposes of a reduction for the mitigating role of the defendant would produce an “absurd result”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Sentelle, Henderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.