· 12/1/1992
United States v. Osneth Olibrices
Citations
- 979 F.2d 1557
- 298 U.S. App. D.C. 347
- 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 31353
- 1992 WL 347084
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a reduction for minor role in an offense cannot be awarded when the larger offense was not taken into account in setting the base level
- holding that a reduction for minor role in an offense cannot be awarded when the larger offense was not taken into account in setting the base level
- “[A] defendant is not entitled to have her sentence reduced for a minimal role in relevant conduct that had no part in the calculation of the base level.”
- “[A] defendant is not entitled to have her sentence reduced for a minimal role in relevant conduct that had no part in the calculation of the base level.”
- where larger conspiracy was not taken into account to set the base offense level, allowing it to be taken into account for purposes of a reduction for the mitigating role of the defendant would produce an “absurd result”
- where larger conspiracy was not taken into account to set the base offense level, -6- allowing it to be taken into account for purposes of a reduction for the mitigating role of the defendant would produce an “absurd result”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edwards, Sentelle, Henderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.