United States v. Oscar Wendell Bennett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that propriety of in-court identification procedure is determined by trial court in exercise of its discretion, and trial court did not abuse its discretion when it admitted into evidence in-court identification of defendant, who was only black male in courtroom
• explaining the unique risks raised by a robber pretending he has a threatening weapon in a robbery
• propriety of in-court identification is within the discretion of the trial judge
• paper bag alleged but not proven to contain dynamite

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).