United States v. Oscar Renda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Striking an affirmative defense is warranted if it cannot, as a matter of law, succeed under any circumstance.”
• finding voluntary assignment occurred when defendant, “acting as [debtor's] representative, caused [debtor] to make the July 2003 and December 2005 transfers and that, at the time of those transfers, [debtor] was insolvent”
• discussing the statute and its application to the circumstances of the asset transfers
• alluding to the federal district court action not only to enforce the $11.8 million claim awarded in the Final Decision but also to recoup $3 million in payments made to Marine as additional compensation to complete the contract
• \Rule 54(b) authorizes a district court to reconsider and reverse its prior rulings on any interlocutory order for any reason it deems sufficient.\
• under the Priority Statute, “a claim arising out of a government contract need not be final to be accorded priority”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).