United States v. Oscar Ortiz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing a defendant’s challenge to his sentence for plain error where he failed to object at sentencing on the grounds asserted on appeal
• “Whether the witnesses have testified truthfully, of course, is entirely for the jury to determine . . . .”
• conduct of a member of a conspiracy must be “both in furtherance of jointly undertaken activity and reasonably foreseeable” for it to be considered at sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).