United States v. Oscar Clemons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “[striking a single black juror could constitute a prima facie case even when blacks ultimately sit on the panel and even when valid reasons exist for striking other blacks
• holding that the striking of \a single black juror could constitute a prima facie case even when blacks ultimately sit on the panel and even when valid reasons exist for striking other blacks.\
• holding that the striking of “a single black juror could constitute a prima facie case even when blacks ultimately sit on the panel and even when valid reasons exist for striking other blacks.”
• noting that the concurrent sentence doctrine does not apply be considered under Pepper v. United States, 562 U.S. 476 (2011), (3) it is “quite possible” he was wrongly convicted, particularly as there was no DNA evidence linking him to the crimes, and (4
• noting that the concurrent sentence doctrine does not apply be considered under Pepper v. United States, 562 U.S. 476 (2011), (3) it is “quite possible” he was wrongly convicted, particularly as there was no DNA evidence linking him to the crimes, and (4
• “Striking a single black juror could constitute a prima facie case even when blacks ultimately sit on the panel and even when valid reasons exist for striking other blacks.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).