· 4/24/1980
United States v. Osban Caston
Citations
- 615 F.2d 1111
- 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 18304
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where defendant rests on “per se” violation of Rule 11 and does not claim any prejudice by the error, “the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and does not merit reversal”
- advisement that one who pleads guilty may be subject later to perjury for his statements under oath \not one of the core inquiries under Rule 11\ and thus not an adequate basis for relief
- \[Caston] was an experienced defen-dant_\
- “[Ca-ston] was an experienced defendant....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vance, Politz, Randall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.