Skip to main content
· 7/29/1986

United States v. Orval W. Anderson

Citations

  • 798 F.2d 919
  • 21 Fed. R. Serv. 284
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • construing the term \should\ as used in a judicial canon to \impose[ ] a mandatory rule of conduct upon a judge.\
  • interpreting a judicial can- non defining what a judge “should” do as a mandatory requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Flaum, Eschbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.