United States v. Orosco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that despite having a unified court system, Wisconsin considers its Board of Bar Examiners, Office of State Courts and Supreme Court to be three separate departments under the Rehabilitation Act because “each have independent control over their staff.”
• “ADA claims against individual defendants in their individual capacity must fail because the [ADA] authorizes suits only against public entities.”
• “The court infers from the fact that Wisconsin funds the Court and the Office [of State Courts] through separate appropriations (and does not fund the Board at all
• “The court infers from the fact that Wisconsin funds the Court and the Office [of State Courts] through separate appropriations (and does not fund the Board at all

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).