Skip to main content
· 1/25/1929

United States v. One Victoria Nash Coupé

Citations

  • 31 F.2d 490
  • 1929 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1069

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “studies [concerning the treatment at issue] demonstrate^], as d[id the] entire controversy, that the medical value of [the treatment] ... [was] hotly disputed among medical professionals” (emphasis added)
  • “We are still left with the fact that on the record before us there is no convincing evidence that [the treatment] has moved beyond the experimental stage.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McVicar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.