United States v. One Still

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting without a Banks Analysis that there must be an “actor” who exercised dominion and control over the chattel
• “Even if the court finds no good cause exists to warrant an extension, the court must at least consider whether any other factors warrant a discretionary extension.”
• “[O]n remand the court should also consider whether Nathalie Hodge waived the defenses of insufficient service of process or lack of personal jurisdiction by voluntarily appearing and participating in the litigation. See 5 V.I.C. §115.”
• “[c]onversion is an intentional exercise of dominion or control over a chattel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).