United States v. One Lot or Parcel of Land

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a claim under New York law after summary judgment was granted on the claim with original jurisdiction
• declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims in case that had been pending over five years
• “‘A district court’s decision whether to exercise [] jurisdiction after dismissing every claim over which it had original jurisdiction is purely discretionary.’” (quoting Carlsbad Tech., Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc., 556 U.S. 635, 639 (2009))
• “State judges are the best arbiters of state law and comity weighs in favor of state decisions being interpreted by state judges, especially when, as here, parallel proceedings in state and federal court could lead to disparate results in each venue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).