United States v. One Copper Still

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the standard of review is whether there is substantial evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the government to support the jury’s verdict”
• providing that general statute and a later-enacted specific statute should be construed to avoid any conflict, unless “such a construction is absolutely necessary in order that the words of the later statute shall have any meaning at all”
• “repeal by implication . . . should occur only when the later statute expressly contradicts the original act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).