· 12/19/1861
United States v. One Case of Watches, Marked U. H. B. D.
Citations
- 27 F. Cas. 256
- 1861 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a court “must make an individualized determination in order to ensure that the bail is not excessive”
- “Meaningful review is not possible where the trial court fails to sufficiently explain its reasoning.”
- reversing and remanding for “the trial court to more thoroughly explain its reasons” for denying a reduction of bail
- reversing and remanding for “the trial court to more thoroughly explain its reasons” for denying a reduction of bail
- “meaningful review is not possible where the trial court fails to sufficiently explain its reasoning.”
- “While we apply an abuse-of-discretion standard . . . meaningful review is not possible where the trial court fails to sufficiently explain its reasoning.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.