Skip to main content
· 12/19/1861

United States v. One Case of Watches, Marked U. H. B. D.

Citations

  • 27 F. Cas. 256
  • 1861 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a court “must make an individualized determination in order to ensure that the bail is not excessive”
  • “Meaningful review is not possible where the trial court fails to sufficiently explain its reasoning.”
  • reversing and remanding for “the trial court to more thoroughly explain its reasons” for denying a reduction of bail
  • reversing and remanding for “the trial court to more thoroughly explain its reasons” for denying a reduction of bail
  • “meaningful review is not possible where the trial court fails to sufficiently explain its reasoning.”
  • “While we apply an abuse-of-discretion standard . . . meaningful review is not possible where the trial court fails to sufficiently explain its reasoning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.