United States v. One Assortment of Eighty-Nine Firearms and Six Hundred and Thirty-Eight Rounds of Ammunition, Robert Daniel, Non-Party

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts have held claimants to strict compliance with the provisions of Rule C(6)
• “[R]egulations promulgated by an administrate agency “ can “supply the ‘law to apply’” in “reviewing administrative agency inaction.”
• government filed civil forfeiture of 89 firearms and 38 rounds of ammunition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).