United States v. One 56-Foot Motor Yacht Named the Tahuna, and New Approach, Inc., Claimant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding probable cause showing \is sufficient by itself to warrant a forfeiture\
• affidavit in support of probable cause determination may be based on hearsay
• \The question of probable cause depends not upon the admissibility of the evidence upon which the government relies but only upon the legal sufficiency and reliability of the evidence.\
• affidavit in support of probable cause determination may be based on hearsay
• \The peculiar procedural requirements of forfeiture laws . . . lead us to conclude that Rule 56(e) does not apply when . . . the sole issue is whether the government has established probable cause to seek forfeiture.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).