United States v. One 1989 Jeep Wagoneer, V.I.N. 1J4GS5874KP105300

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that although “a basic principle of ERISA [is] that terms of a plan may not be modified or superseded by oral statements or other extrinsic evidence,” estoppel based on oral assurances remains a viable theory in situations like Armistead

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).