United States v. One 1988 Dodge Pickup, Robert Quintanilla-Buendia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 4(a)(4) “does not embrace a second Rule 59 motion that merely challenges the denial of the original Rule 59 motion.”
• “[I]t is clear that the proper characterization of the motion for these purposes is not determined by the label that the motion bears.”
• “[I]t is clear that the proper characterization of the motion for these purposes is not determined by the label that the motion bears.”
• “Any motion that draws into question the correctness of the judgment is functionally a motion under Rule 59(e).” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).