United States v. One 1987 Mercedes Benz Roadster 560 Sec, Vin Wdbba48d3ha064462

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a turnover order from the circuit court of the county in which the res was seized is the appropriate method
• the holding of One 1979 Chevrolet \does not depend on the existence of a competing state forfeiture proceeding\
• a turnover order from the circuit court of the county in which the res was seized is the appropriate method
• the holding of One 1979 Chevrolet “does not depend on the existence of a competing state forfeiture proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).