Skip to main content
· 6/8/1989

United States v. One 1983 Mazda RX-7 VIN JM1FB331800715818

Citations

  • 717 F. Supp. 570
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9540
  • 1989 WL 91127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding lack of exhaustion on the face of the complaint when “unconventional” complaint contained only two letters, one from the plaintiff and one from a representative of defendant
  • “Because exhaustion is an affirmative defense, a Rule 56 ‘summary judgment motion is the proper vehicle for considering a defendant’s claim that a plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies before filing a civil action.’” (quoting Gunn, 2012 WL 1711555, at )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norgle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.