Skip to main content
· 7/10/1991

United States v. One 1979 Chevrolet C-20 Van, and Elizabeth Anderson, Claimant-Appellant

Citations

  • 924 F.2d 120

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where state court had previously asserted jurisdiction in state forfeiture proceeding, federal court lacked jurisdiction to entertain federal forfeiture complaint
  • \The fact that the federal authorities muscled in on the van and began an administrative forfeiture proceeding before the state court action was filed did not confer jurisdiction on the federal court.\
  • “A local police department may not take seized property and just pass it on as it pleases to the FBI in flagrant disregard of state laws mandating judicial authority for such turnovers”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Wood, Cudahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.