Skip to main content
· 10/5/1976

United States v. One 1975 Mercury Monarch Serial No. 5E35L539729

Citations

  • 423 F. Supp. 1026
  • 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In view of the sweeping language of the forfeiture statute, it is of no legal significance . . . that the cocaine may have been intended for Ramos’s own personal use, and not intended for sale or resale to others”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haight

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.