United States v. One 1975 Chevrolet K-5 Blazer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prior adjudication had determined that the subject vehicle had been used to facilitate the transportation of marihuana, and therefore the claimant's interest that arose after this facilitation was of no effect
• holding that a prior adjudication had determined that the subject vehicle had been used to facilitate the transportation of marihuana, and therefore the claimant’s interest that arose after this facilitation was of no effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).