United States v. One 1938 Chevrolet Coach Automobile

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the court need not address whether termination returned to the plaintiff enforcement rights under the patent because the “more fundamental problem” was whether the material breach occurred in the first instance
• finding a plaintiff failed to show it regained the right to enforce a patent where the plaintiff “simply by a unilateral declaration” stated, “that the . . . agreement [was] terminated . . . without any support”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).