United States v. One (1) Oldsmobile Sedan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is undisputed that none of the [Suspicious Activity Reports] and resulting investigations led to any credible evidence of terror financing.” (emphasis added)
• “Nat-West employees involved with internal investigations of Interpal testified that Nat-West had a zero tolerance policy for terror financing.” (emphasis added)
• “There is no evidence to suggest that, had NatWest known or actually suspected Interpal of terror financing, it would have done anything other than close its accounts.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).