United States v. One (1) 1971 Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Serial 4a25791h1, Its Tools and Appurtenances, Michael Ohlmann, Claimant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence may be introduced in a forfeiture proceeding if it was “derived independently” of an unconstitutional seizure of the res
• holding that evidence may be introduced in a forfeiture proceeding if it was “derived independently” of an unconstitutional seizure of the res
• holding that evidence may be introduced in a forfeiture proceeding if it was “derived inde- pendently” of an unconstitutional seizure of the res
• holding that evidence may be introduced in a forfeiture proceeding if it was “derived inde- pendently” of an unconstitutional seizure of the res
• “[E]vidence derived from a search in violation of the Fourth Amendment must be excluded at a forfeiture proceeding,” but “so long as the requirements for forfeiture were proven by evidence not tainted by the seizure, the contraband could properly be forfeited.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).