United States v. On Tai
Citations
- 3 D. Haw. 491
Syllabus
<p>Indictment — Examination of defendant before grand jury: An indictment will not be quashed because, in the course of an investigation by a grand jury, the person subsequently indicted was subpoenaed and examined as a witness and gave self-incriminating testimony, where he knew, in at least a general way, what matter was being investigated, and was clearly advised of his right to decline to answer questions which might tend to incriminate him.</p> <p>Same — Practice: The calling and examining of the accused under the circumstances shown in the opinion, disapproved.</p>
Judges: Robertson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.