Skip to main content
· 3/19/1910

United States v. On Tai

Citations

  • 3 D. Haw. 491

Syllabus

<p>Indictment — Examination of defendant before grand jury: An indictment will not be quashed because, in the course of an investigation by a grand jury, the person subsequently indicted was subpoenaed and examined as a witness and gave self-incriminating testimony, where he knew, in at least a general way, what matter was being investigated, and was clearly advised of his right to decline to answer questions which might tend to incriminate him.</p> <p>Same — Practice: The calling and examining of the accused under the circumstances shown in the opinion, disapproved.</p>

Judges: Robertson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.