United States v. Omari Elliot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a witness’s independent viewing of the defendant’s photos on the internet and surveillance footage of the robbery at the store where the robbery occurred prior to the lineup was not the result of police misconduct
• holding that a witness’s independent viewing of the defendant’s photos on the internet and surveillance footage of the robbery at the store where the robbery occurred prior to the lineup was not the result of police misconduct
• holding that a witness's independent viewing of the defendant's photos on the internet and surveillance footage of the robbery at the store where the robbery occurred prior to the lineup was not the result of police misconduct
• holding an Alabama “youthful offender adjudication” qualified as a conviction for purposes of classifying defendant as a career offender under § 4B1.1, even though a youthful offender adjudication did not qualify as a conviction under Alabama law
• declining to express an opinion on “the interaction of the ACCA and [Alabama’s] Youthful Offender Act” while deciding that a youthful offender adjudication can qualify as a felony conviction under the career offender provision of the Sentencing Guidelines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).