Skip to main content
· 6/21/2016

United States v. Olmedo-Mendoza

Citations

  • 667 F. App'x 107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “While the defendants undoubtedly benefited from their transactions with the plaintiffs, there is no indication that the plaintiffs should not have . . . expect[ed] . . . as much.”
  • “While the defendants undoubtedly benefited from their transactions with the plaintiffs, there is no indication that the plaintiffs should not have . . . expect[ed] . . . as much.”
  • “The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint after the first motion to dismiss was filed. Because the plaintiffs have failed to state a claim after two opportunities to do so, the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clement, Jones, Owen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.